%  SAM: /projects/compbio/bin/i686/hmmscore v3.4 (July 31, 2003) compiled 02/04/04_14:53:24
%  (c) 1992-2001 Regents of the University of California, Santa Cruz
%
%          Sequence Alignment and Modeling Software System
%         http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/sam.html
%
% ----------------- Citations (SAM, SAM-T2K, HMMs) --------------------
% R. Hughey, A. Krogh, Hidden Markov models for sequence analysis:
%  Extension and analysis of the basic method, CABIOS 12:95-107, 1996.
% K. Karplus, et al., What is the value added by human intervention in protein
%  structure prediction, Proteins: Stucture, Function, Genetics 45(S5):86--91, 2001.
% A. Krogh et al., Hidden Markov models in computational biology:
%  Applications to protein modeling, JMB 235:1501-1531, Feb 1994.
% ---------------------------------------------------------------------
%  dsspfoo.1.T0242.t04-100-30-stride-ebghtl   Host: cheep    Wed Jul 14 15:22:01 2004
%  karplus                                    Dir:  /projects/compbio/experiments/protein-predict/casp6/T0242
% ---------------------------------------------------------------------
% Inserted Files: 
% Database Files:  /projects/compbio/experiments/models.97/indexes/t04.x-seqs,/projects/compbio/experiments/models.97/indexes/t04.2ds
%
% Subsequence-submodel (local) (SW = 2)
% Simple scores adjusted by +1.5*ln(seq len) (adjust_score = 2)
% Track 0 FIMs added (geometric mean of match probabilities (6))
% Track 0 Coeff 1.000 File T0242.t04.w0.5.mod
% Track 1 FIMs added (the generic node (5))
% Track 1 Coeff 0.300 File T0242.t04.stride-ebghtl.mod
% Score DP Method: forward all-paths (dpstyle = 0)
% Align DP Method: viterbi (adpstyle = 1)
% 6616 sequences, 1561821 residues, 117 nodes, 36.69 seconds
%
% Sequence scores selected if better than:
%	 E-value (Emax 4.0e+01) (select_score=4)
%
% Simple: NLL-NULL using FIM probabilities
% Reverse: NLL-NULL for the reverse sequence NULL model
%    Calculated when Simple < simple_threshold (0.00)
% E-value on N (=10050) sequences:
%    N / (1 + exp(-(lambda(=1.3975) * Reverse)^tau(=0.7724)))
%    Calculated when Simple < simple_threshold (0.00)
%    Rescale E-values or use -dbsize for multiple scoring runs.
% Scores sorted by E-value, best first
%
% Sequence ID   Length      Simple     Reverse     E-value      X count
1dgyA             363       -24.73      -13.59     6.05e-01
1liiA             363       -24.73      -13.58     6.08e-01
1fxlA             167       -21.32      -10.01     4.66e+00
1uqrA             154       -20.11       -9.95     4.84e+00
1kq3A             376       -18.40       -9.00     8.54e+00
1f6bA             198       -18.01       -8.84     9.40e+00
1fs7A             485       -16.88       -8.73     1.01e+01
1rypA             243       -17.70       -8.27     1.34e+01
1bywA             110       -20.25       -8.26     1.35e+01
1vicA             262       -18.66       -8.15     1.44e+01
1e4fT             419       -18.26       -7.64     1.98e+01
1pbtA             244       -20.18       -7.48     2.18e+01
1vkmA             297       -17.14       -7.46     2.21e+01
1lsuA             147       -17.42       -7.39     2.31e+01
1fl1A             230       -16.92       -7.39     2.31e+01
3rabA             169       -19.34       -7.04     2.90e+01
1j6wA             175       -16.65       -6.96     3.04e+01
1ir6A             424       -15.44       -6.92     3.12e+01
1fm0E             150       -15.88       -6.91     3.14e+01
1b5pA             385       -16.95       -6.82     3.32e+01
1l3iA             192       -18.68       -6.82     3.34e+01
1id0A             152       -19.12       -6.74     3.50e+01
1bjwA             382       -16.82       -6.70     3.61e+01
1sjwA             144       -16.32       -6.63     3.78e+01
1o0wA             252       -17.00       -6.55     3.96e+01