% SAM: /projects/compbio/bin/i686/hmmscore v3.4 (July 31, 2003) compiled 09/03/03_16:30:36 % (c) 1992-2001 Regents of the University of California, Santa Cruz % % Sequence Alignment and Modeling Software System % http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/sam.html % % ----------------- Citations (SAM, SAM-T2K, HMMs) -------------------- % R. Hughey, A. Krogh, Hidden Markov models for sequence analysis: % Extension and analysis of the basic method, CABIOS 12:95-107, 1996. % K. Karplus, et al., What is the value added by human intervention in protein % structure prediction, Proteins: Stucture, Function, Genetics 45(S5):86--91, 2001. % A. Krogh et al., Hidden Markov models in computational biology: % Applications to protein modeling, JMB 235:1501-1531, Feb 1994. % --------------------------------------------------------------------- % CB_burial_14_7foo.1.YGR212W.t2k-100-30-CB_burial_14_7 Host: cc50 Sun Oct 12 01:40:01 2003 % karplus Dir: /projects/compbio/experiments/protein-predict/yeast/YGR2/YGR212W % --------------------------------------------------------------------- % Inserted Files: % Database Files: /projects/compbio/experiments/models.97/indexes/t2k.x-seqs,/projects/compbio/experiments/models.97/indexes/t2k.CB-burial-14-7s % % Subsequence-submodel (local) (SW = 2) % Simple scores adjusted by ln(seq len) (adjust_score = 2) % Track 0 FIMs added (geometric mean of match probabilities (6)) % Track 0 Coeff 1.000 File YGR212W.t2k-w0.5.mod % Track 1 FIMs added (the generic node (5)) % Track 1 Coeff 0.300 File YGR212W.t2k.CB_burial_14_7.mod % Score DP Method: forward all-paths (dpstyle = 0) % Align DP Method: viterbi (adpstyle = 1) % 8763 sequences, 2072585 residues, 469 nodes, 437.98 seconds % % Sequence scores selected if better than: % E-value (Emax 4.0e+01) (select_score=4) % % Simple: NLL-NULL using FIM probabilities % Reverse: NLL-NULL for the reverse sequence NULL model % Calculated when Simple < simple_threshold (0.00) % E-value on N (=8162) sequences: % N / (1 + exp(-(lambda(=1.5473) * Reverse)^tau(=0.7636))) % Calculated when Simple < simple_threshold (0.00) % Rescale E-values or use -dbsize for multiple scoring runs. % Scores sorted by E-value, best first % % Sequence ID Length Simple Reverse E-value X count 1jk0B 345 -38.81 -13.72 2.72e-01 1fgyA 127 -32.20 -9.48 3.43e+00 1mr7A 209 -34.31 -9.10 4.35e+00 1kk6A 209 -34.68 -8.69 5.67e+00 1jb2A 127 -30.65 -8.03 8.64e+00 1ldjB 90 -29.03 -7.71 1.06e+01 4ubpB 126 -33.39 -7.69 1.08e+01 1ubpB 122 -32.93 -7.44 1.28e+01 7ahlA 293 -35.57 -7.20 1.50e+01 7icd 416 -30.43 -7.10 1.59e+01 1a4kA 217 -32.36 -6.99 1.73e+01 1mxiA 160 -30.32 -6.64 2.18e+01 1wjbA 55 -26.48 -6.58 2.27e+01 1o54A 277 -30.47 -6.58 2.27e+01 1k87A 669 -34.26 -6.53 2.35e+01 1iso 416 -29.68 -6.50 2.40e+01 1lvl 458 -30.82 -6.50 2.40e+01 1dkzA 219 -33.17 -6.42 2.53e+01 1dkxA 219 -32.92 -6.37 2.63e+01 1g6oA 330 -30.65 -6.27 2.81e+01 1pb1A 416 -29.51 -6.20 2.94e+01 1jm4B 118 -28.17 -6.07 3.22e+01 1b5fA 239 -32.77 -6.06 3.25e+01 1gy6A 127 -28.98 -6.04 3.28e+01 1flcB 175 -33.36 -5.99 3.41e+01 1bd2D 204 -30.20 -5.98 3.42e+01 1kxoA 184 -28.71 -5.97 3.44e+01 1f4qA 165 -29.37 -5.89 3.65e+01 1jn5B 250 -31.06 -5.84 3.79e+01 1g3p 217 -29.01 -5.81 3.86e+01 1obpA 159 -31.08 -5.80 3.89e+01