% SAM: /projects/compbio/bin/i686/hmmscore v3.3.2 (February, 2001) compiled 06/24/02_10:50:12 % (c) 1992-2001 Regents of the University of California, Santa Cruz % % Sequence Alignment and Modeling Software System % http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/sam.html % % ----------------- Citations (SAM, SAM-T99, HMMs) -------------------- % R. Hughey, A. Krogh, Hidden Markov models for sequence analysis: % Extension and analysis of the basic method, CABIOS 12:95-107, 1996. % K. Karplus, C. Barrett, R. Hughey, Hidden Markov models for detecting % remote protein homologies, Bioinformatics 14(10):846-856, 1998. % A. Krogh et al., Hidden Markov models in computational biology: % Applications to protein modeling, JMB 235:1501-1531, Feb 1994. % --------------------------------------------------------------------- % dsspfoo.1.YGR039W.t2k-100-30-dssp-ebghstl Host: cc41 Fri Nov 8 19:44:31 2002 % karplus Dir: /projects/compbio/experiments/protein-predict/yeast/YGR0/YGR039W % --------------------------------------------------------------------- % Inserted Files: % Database Files: /projects/compbio/experiments/models.97/indexes/t2k.x-seqs,/projects/compbio/experiments/models.97/indexes/t2k.dssps % % Subsequence-submodel (local) (SW = 2) % Simple scores adjusted by ln(seq len) (adjust_score = 2) % Track 0 FIMs added (geometric mean of match probabilities (6)) % Track 0 Coeff 1.000 File YGR039W.t2k-w0.5.mod % Track 1 FIMs added (the generic node (5)) % Track 1 Coeff 0.300 File YGR039W.t2k.dssp-ebghstl.mod % Score DP Method: forward all-paths (dpstyle = 0) % Align DP Method: viterbi (adpstyle = 1) % 7323 sequences, 1713023 residues, 104 nodes, 70.28 seconds % % Sequence scores selected if better than: % E-value (Emax 4.0e+01) (select_score=4) % % Simple: NLL-NULL using FIM probabilities % Reverse: NLL-NULL for the reverse sequence NULL model % Calculated when Simple < simple_threshold (0.00) % E-value on N (=7316) sequences: % N / (1 + exp(-(lambda(=2.1193) * Reverse)^tau(=0.7337))) % Calculated when Simple < simple_threshold (0.00) % Rescale E-values or use -dbsize for multiple scoring runs. % Scores sorted by E-value, best first % % Sequence ID Length Simple Reverse E-value X count 1h2eA 207 -27.10 -6.81 6.10e+00 1hf2A 210 -26.41 -6.56 7.39e+00 1ebbA 202 -26.71 -6.51 7.66e+00 1bhe 376 -26.58 -6.41 8.27e+00 1fjgB 256 -28.01 -6.25 9.39e+00 1j5eB 256 -27.80 -6.07 1.08e+01 1qczA 169 -27.20 -5.98 1.16e+01 1tmy 120 -25.68 -5.96 1.17e+01 1sfp 114 -23.88 -5.88 1.25e+01 1h4wA 224 -24.21 -5.47 1.75e+01 1c1kA 217 -26.64 -5.42 1.81e+01 1pmt 203 -25.15 -5.34 1.93e+01 1szt 68 -22.91 -5.32 1.97e+01 1pyp 285 -24.52 -5.15 2.26e+01 1jj7A 260 -26.22 -5.10 2.36e+01 1b4bA 71 -21.98 -5.08 2.39e+01 1hd2A 161 -24.21 -5.04 2.48e+01 1rtfB 252 -24.32 -4.85 2.91e+01 1kr4A 125 -24.45 -4.84 2.91e+01 1jytA 163 -24.44 -4.79 3.06e+01 1jkeA 145 -22.65 -4.74 3.17e+01 8prkA 287 -24.81 -4.73 3.21e+01 1dcpA 104 -22.97 -4.69 3.32e+01 1dcoA 104 -22.97 -4.67 3.38e+01 1amp 291 -24.55 -4.65 3.43e+01 1vid 221 -25.29 -4.65 3.44e+01 1im5A 180 -25.94 -4.64 3.46e+01 1f93A 104 -22.85 -4.60 3.56e+01 1jfgA 374 -26.59 -4.60 3.57e+01 1kaeA 434 -26.67 -4.58 3.64e+01 1jfaA 374 -26.63 -4.55 3.71e+01 1ifc 132 -22.65 -4.49 3.91e+01