[Genome] Question on multiz
Brooke Rhead
rhead at soe.ucsc.edu
Thu Oct 11 12:27:14 PDT 2007
Hello Sen Kwan,
One of our developers had the following comments for you:
----
I can't address why he didn't get alignments out of blastn or bl2seq,
but this region of human (chr15:22,888,200-22,888,617) is somewhat
homologous to scaffold_169278:1189-1699 in rabbit though only at about
50% id, so BLAT is not going to find it.
Blastz is very sensitive. The user may want to look at the Rabbit Chain
and the Rabbit browser on genome-test to check out the detailed
alignments with just human and rabbit. You can see here that the contig
this is in (contig_315977) doesn't cover the entire region in human.
Since the rabbit is only 2X coverage, there isn't a way to determine
synteny, so the alignment needs to be carefully evaluated by the
researcher before accepting it as really orthologous.
----
The rabbit chain (on hg18) and rabbit browser he is referring to reside
on our test server, here:
http://genome-test.cse.ucsc.edu/
The contig mentioned above is located in this position on the rabbit
browser: scaffold_169278:1-1,806.
Note that much of the data available on our test server has not gone
through our quality assurance process and may contain errors.
--
Brooke Rhead
UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group
Tay Sen Kwan wrote:
> I am using the Genome Browser to look at the conservation of certain
> cDNAs across a number of species, in particular the 28-species multiz
> conservation track. For example, BC069077 which lies on chr15 q11.2,
> showed sequence alignment with the rabbit. However, when I extracted
> the rabbit sequence from the rabbit track, remove the gaps "-" and did 3
> alignment tests (with other tools) on it:
> (a) a "Align two sequences using BLAST (bl2seq)" with BC069077 on NCBI
> Blast - it gave a "no significant similarity" result
> (b) a NCBI BLASTN on the human sequence with a very relaxed Expect=10
> value, and it found no alignments on chr15
> (c) a BLAT which also turn up no alignments on chr15
>
> None of these tests indicated alignment to BC069077. Could you help me
> resolve this apparent contradiction ? Many thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sen Kwan
> _______________________________________________
> Genome maillist - Genome at soe.ucsc.edu
> http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
More information about the Genome
mailing list