[Genome] Missing BAC End Pairs

[Hiram Clawson]

Good Afternoon Scott:

Upon closer examination of this situation, we may have discovered an
error in our processing here that caused some of these items to be missed.
I'm going to do a survey tomorrow of our data to determine how many of
these things were missed due to our error.  We will have to decide on
a remedy depending upon how many of these things were missed.

--Hiram

Hiram Clawson wrote:
> Good Morning Scott:
> 
> When I input these two identifiers into the NCBI Clone Registry
> database, the first one has a status of "Auto-Expired",
> I'm assuming that means it is no longer valid:
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/clone/clname.cgi?stype=Id&list=238336
> 
> And the 2nd one does not indicate any location in the human genome, so
> I'm guessing its end sequences do not map well enough to the human genome
> to determine its location:
> When I blat the two end sequences of RP11-67O15 it may map to
> chr1:39464364-39648064
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/clone/clname.cgi?stype=Id&list=250840
> 
> --Hiram
> 
> Scott Sulpizio wrote:
>> When I've tried to convert my BAC End Pair information I've obtained
>> from the May 2004 human assembly to the Mar. 2006 assembly about 1.5% of
>> my BAC End Pairs are missing. Is there a reason for this? Most of the
>> ones I can't find are from plates 31-67. For example RP11-31B9 and
>> RP11-67O15.  
>> Thanks, Scott
>>  
>> Scott Sulpizio
>> Research and Development Associate
>> Signature Genomic Laboratories
>> 120 N Pine Street, Suite 242
>> Spokane, WA 99202
>> www.signaturegenomics.com
>> P)  509-474-6932
>> F)  509-474-6839
>> sulpizio at signaturegenomics.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Genome maillist  -  Genome at soe.ucsc.edu
>> http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
>>
> 
>