[Genome] Missing BAC End Pairs
Hiram Clawson
hiram at soe.ucsc.edu
Tue Jul 17 11:48:21 PDT 2007
Good Morning Scott:
When I input these two identifiers into the NCBI Clone Registry
database, the first one has a status of "Auto-Expired",
I'm assuming that means it is no longer valid:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/clone/clname.cgi?stype=Id&list=238336
And the 2nd one does not indicate any location in the human genome, so
I'm guessing its end sequences do not map well enough to the human genome
to determine its location:
When I blat the two end sequences of RP11-67O15 it may map to
chr1:39464364-39648064
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/clone/clname.cgi?stype=Id&list=250840
--Hiram
Scott Sulpizio wrote:
> When I've tried to convert my BAC End Pair information I've obtained
> from the May 2004 human assembly to the Mar. 2006 assembly about 1.5% of
> my BAC End Pairs are missing. Is there a reason for this? Most of the
> ones I can't find are from plates 31-67. For example RP11-31B9 and
> RP11-67O15.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
> Scott Sulpizio
> Research and Development Associate
> Signature Genomic Laboratories
> 120 N Pine Street, Suite 242
> Spokane, WA 99202
> www.signaturegenomics.com
> P) 509-474-6932
> F) 509-474-6839
> sulpizio at signaturegenomics.com
> _______________________________________________
> Genome maillist - Genome at soe.ucsc.edu
> http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
>
More information about the Genome
mailing list